Bottom 10: The typewriters with the worst touch.

 

Screen Shot 2014-11-18 at 2.21.03 pm

Screen Shot 2014-11-18 at 2.21.17 pm Screen Shot 2014-11-18 at 2.21.24 pm

 


 

The Imperial Bad Companion: The Litton Imperial 220

Screen Shot 2014-11-18 at 2.21.38 pm

 


 

107a7-corona

The corona 3 Folding typewriter. Not made for speed and those long type bars are to blame.

 

 

Screen Shot 2014-11-18 at 2.21.50 pm

 


 

The poorly planned Plana.

Screen Shot 2014-11-18 at 2.22.04 pm

 


 

7982d-bingoh

It may say BING, but it doesn’t ring your bell.

 

Screen Shot 2014-11-18 at 2.22.14 pm

 


 

If only this underwood typed like it looked.

Screen Shot 2014-11-18 at 2.22.23 pm

 


 

The massive dissapointment of the Masspro

Screen Shot 2014-11-18 at 2.22.33 pm


 

 

 

Make a poor quality typewriter? Ten-Four buddy!

Errrm, this should read ‘Ten-Forty, not Two-Forty’.

Screen Shot 2014-11-18 at 2.22.42 pm


 

 

Let of some steam, Bennett…

Screen Shot 2014-11-18 at 2.22.53 pm


 

 

 

Splendid by name, not so Splendid by type-feel.

Screen Shot 2014-11-18 at 2.23.03 pm


 

Fantastic to look at, blick to type on.

Fantastic to look at, blick to type on.

Screen Shot 2014-11-18 at 2.23.12 pm


 

Screen Shot 2014-11-18 at 2.24.11 pm

14 thoughts on “Bottom 10: The typewriters with the worst touch.

  1. The few I have that you mention I agree on the Underwoods of the 50s, the splendid and kind-of the Corona 3. I like my Corona 3 except for the double shift. I’ve not found the keyboard wobbly or the action very slow. If I had a choice between keeping the Corona 3 or any of my Olympia machines, the Corona would stay.

    Like

  2. I agree on all of these except the Olympia. I like my SF. And oddly, many complain about how stiff the keyboard is — whereas you have the opposite complaint, if I understand correctly. Some of these little Olympias have a touch control that is VERY effective and can turn the keyboard into a tight trampoline.

    Like

    • It is interesting, as I have had 3 SFs so far, but none of them have felt particularly identical. The only similarities I have had have been the early ending of the strike the is – to me – so jarring.

      Like

  3. I’m surprised to see the Silver-Seiko Imperial at the top of that list. my Royal version is a right treat to type on. I suppose it might just be a condition thing, though – mine was in out-of-the-box new condition. (keys were not even yellowed)

    Like

  4. Enjoyed the often savage but amusing criticism! An orange 70s Adler Contessa I briefly owned was TRULY AWFUL, as was a Nakajima KMART. In comparison my Royal 240 (Silver-Seiko) is not so bad (although I must admit not that good either).

    Like

  5. I agree about the plastic Remingtons. Heavy, lacklustre, and awful to type on. The Olympia 99 is a love/hate for me. Feels spongy at times, and then other times it seems to type okay. Nice styling to it, though. Like a SM4 that’s been starved.

    Like

  6. Pingback: Let off some steam, Bennett (typewriter) | The Filthy Platen

  7. 50s Underwoods don’t get much love, but I must say my Quiet Tab Deluxe types great, plus it has that way cool typeface with those bulbous p, q, b, d characters. Plus it looks like a Buick! Funky cool!

    Like

Leave a comment